A Philosophical Question...

rated by 0 users
Answered (Not Verified) This post has 0 verified answers | 12 Replies | 6 Followers

Not Ranked
10 Posts
Points 305
PatrickH2 posted on 4 Jun 2009 2:43 PM

Does a portrait of a sleeping cat qualify as a "still life" painting?

 

(Just one of those things that make you go, "Hmm?") 

  • | Post Points: 80

All Replies

Top 50 Contributor
495 Posts
Points 6,700
Trusted Users

IMO?  No.  Sorry.  But funny!

If you wish to drown, do not torture yourself with shallow water.  (Bulgarian Proverb)

http://www.danadabagia.com

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
700 Posts
Points 10,805
Trusted Users

Hmmmm...and when you have more than one, are they still lives?  9 life still lives? Wink

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
132 Posts
Points 5,310

Though the cat make look deceased, it is still alive, so I suggest a sleeping cat setup is a 'still alive.' Or perhaps a 'still alife.'

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
10 Posts
Points 215
I see your point. I have always thought "Still Life" was not a helpful use of words. Shall we coin a new word for the "Still Life" painting/drawing? Who likes "Stillaio" = STILL Arrangement of Inanimate Objects!? If it is not a word for something else already. Can anyone find out?
Top 150 Contributor
173 Posts
Points 3,210

But what happens when you paint a person sleeping, we still call it a portrait, right? Why should it be different for an animal portrait, sleeping or not. Just brainstorming here.

YVS

http://tinyurl.com/yvsokolovArt

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
984 Posts
Points 13,980

Sleeping cat = animal portrait...

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
10 Posts
Points 305

Everybody,

Yes, clearly a portrait of a cat, sleeping or otherwise, is still a portrait.  I think some folks may be losing sight of the fact that this was a tongue-in-cheek question not intended to be taken seriously.

For those of us who live with and love our furry feline kids, few things seem quite as inanimate as a sleeping cat (except when their feet and whiskers twitch as they dream.)  One day I was reading an art magazine article about still life drawings while one of my cats was sleeping on a table next to a lamp that looked just like the lamp in the still life on the page of the magazine.  I imagined my sleeping cat into the picture on the page and thought that it still looked like a still life.

But, just to be difficult, consider this:  a picture/painting/drawing can be called a "landscape" when it contains, for example, a shore front scene with boats, birds, and people on the beach.  The people add to the mood of the landscape, but don't change the fact that it's still a landscape.  If there's only one person on the beach in this landscape it's still a landscape, isn't it?  With this in mind, when does a "still life" of a lamp on a table by a curtained window become a portrait by the addition of a cat?

Ok, so now the conversation is no longer quite so tongue-in-cheek. 

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
10 Posts
Points 215
O.K. If a person or cat or other animal in a picture/painting/drawing commands it in some way then I would say the work is a portrait. A Stillaio = STILL Arrangement of Inanimate Objects, may have a cooked crab or fried fish but nothing alive that commands the picture/drawing/painting.
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
5,788 Posts
Points 40,955

Aren't you basically talking about the center of interest or focal point here?

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
322 Posts
Points 3,200

I think we are having fun yet!

A season is set for everything; a time for every experience under heaven.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
23 Posts
Points 295

Yeah, If the cat is a sculpture.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
3 Posts
Points 45

I have to say, "It's Aliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiive!!!!" (Frankenstein) The cat is breathing, &, therefore, moving. Definitely not a still life.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (13 items) | RSS