The Importance of Choosing a Master

13 Apr 2011

Self Portrait by Egon Schiele, 1912.

Let's say you're Egon Schiele. You have a singular vision so original, so violently intense, that you can develop as an artist by feeding exclusively on your own inspiration. Your drive will crush every obstacle in your way--even feed on it, transforming your mistakes and flaws into revelations.

Now let's say you're you or me. We might be good or talented--maybe we'll even become great. But in order to get where we’re going, we have a body of technical skill that we need to add to our toolboxes. What should we do about that?
 
My first step was to choose a master. This master, preferably someone safely dead, will act as your pole star. This master will be someone not only of massive artistic accomplishment, but of formidable technical skill. By studying the master's work, you will find both inspiration in terms of what art can express, and insight into how art expresses it. Your master will have produced work of such technical sophistication that you can spend hours poring over his or her work, learning new lessons as your own skills advance enough to prepare you for further growth.

The Virgin and Child with St. Anne and
St. John the Baptist
by Leonardo da Vinci,
c.1499-1500.

I chose Leonardo Da Vinci. In the next few posts, I will describe to you how and what I learned from my years of studying Da Vinci.

But in the meantime, I want to share with you what I think is the most important reason to choose a master: you should always be thinking of an artist better than you. It is important (albeit egomaniacal) in the process of becoming an artist to think that you are the best artist who has ever walked this humble Earth.

But it is just as important to think that you are nothing, that you are the lowest of the low. Very little inspires the will to improve like the company of someone who demonstrates that there is still room to improve. When you depend only on yourself, you depend on the inspiration of one person. When you have a master, you depend on the inspiration of two. A conversation is often a better place to learn new things than a monologue.

--Daniel


Filed under:
Related Posts
+ Add a comment

Comments

KatPaints wrote
on 14 Apr 2011 5:12 AM

"But it is just as important to think that you are nothing, that you are the lowest of the low. Very little inspires the will to improve like the company of someone who demonstrates that there is still room to improve. When you depend only on yourself, you depend on the inspiration of one person. When you have a master, you depend on the inspiration of two. A conversation is often a better place to learn new things than a monologue."

This sounds a little too Catholic for me. At 47, I realized beating myself down has gone nowhere. I've been down that "thinking I'm the lowest of the low" road and it sucks. I was underpaid and living in poverty. Awful!

Inspiration can be found anywhere within anyone. Having one Master may work for someone if your a "monotheist" but I found their lessons are limited and can be easily misunderstood. Nonetheless, it is a good idea for some. I tend to admire living artists and many artists. Seeing the beauty and potential of every artists good, bad, or great, helps me to recognize  what sparked their interest or my interest in them. A painting may be technically poor, but have a unique subject matter. In turn, I see the importance of choosing a subject matter that draws me in. A painting may be technically wonderful, but look outdated as if the artist was a member of the society of anachronism. I can then see the importance for me to be current and relevant to what is going on today. For me inspiration can be found anywhere even within a dog crossing the street.

JamesBD wrote
on 14 Apr 2011 7:37 AM

Thanks Daniel, I enjoyed this post.

I choose Caravaggio!

Kisu wrote
on 14 Apr 2011 1:44 PM

Only one master?!  That's going to be a tough one, Daniel.  I guess I'm 'serial' in that respect, fickle in focusing on one master for a time and then being distracted by another.  I also think an artist has to work past or through the 'I'm so great-I'm so inadequate' thing to where you can realistically assess your true weaknesses and strengths, but I know these mood swings are very typical of most artists.  We all do that.  

on 14 Apr 2011 5:49 PM

Another fascinating blog Daniel (as always from you!) ... I have had Leonardo as my Master since I was about 13 years old!!!   I also agree that an artist must have a Master who inspires improvement, but that same artist must also never think that they are great in any way.  My Old Master asked me on day one "what do you want to do with your art" and I told him I wanted to be better than his best student and beat her in the annual show.  No names, because I did - and since then I like to consistently pick (in addition to my hero Leonardo) an artist who paints in a style to which I aspire, and then work towards that.  Added to the latest midnight flashes of inspiration, it has worked to date. The whole process is fascinating to me - and the fact that it actually comes to fruition amazes me every single time.  I have no control over it ... yikes!!!

on 29 Apr 2011 8:26 AM

Great post, Daniel! I especially liked what you said about choosing a master so that you have a second source of inspiration. Like several other commenters, I have followed a succession of masters over the years, everyone from Constable to Pissarro to Diebenkorn. How lucky are we that we can rely on the inspiration of one master guide or many--whatever we want and need?!

Jennifer