Painting Portraits with Personality, Mood, and Character

28 Jun 2011

Portrait of Ginevra di Benci by Leonardo da Vinci, 1474-1476, oil painting on wood, 16.5 x 14.5.

Portrait of Ginevra di Benci by Leonardo da Vinci,
1474-1476, oil painting on wood, 16.5 x 14.5.

I've described the most important technical parts of my study of Da Vinci: line and anatomy. When I began to study how to paint, I opted not to follow his methods, so I haven't got anything to share with you about the famous sfumato, admirable though it is.

Let me explain something about how I learn about art; a quirk, perhaps, of being self-taught. I usually don't read books by or about my subject. I've read snippets of Da Vinci's notebooks, but haven't made anything like a complete study of them. I am only sketchily aware of his biography and his role in Western art. I like to learn by looking at things, and I think I've been served well so far by this practice, even if I have woeful gaps in my knowledge.

One of the most important things I learned from Da Vinci was in line with this practice of looking at things. It was simply this: his figures and portraits have so much soul. I have spent hours in the National Gallery in silent conversation with his bewitching Ginevra di Benci.

Madonna of the Rocks (detail) by Leonardo da Vinci, 1483-1486, oil painting, 78.3 x 48.
Madonna of the Rocks (detail)
by Leonardo da Vinci,
1483-1486, oil painting, 78.3 x 48.
How long can you talk to a painting? It's a good question. I think it has to do with how much personality is present in the painting itself. Ginevra is multi-sided. She looks as if she has a personality, and moods, and thoughts. She appears complex and self-possessed. She serves a role in no story but her own, and she's not entirely interested in telling you what her story is. So my approach to this picture is a pilgrimage to her; it is not hers to me. This is a picture, but it is not a show.

Da Vinci's portrait paintings brim with substance and presence. Consider the angel Gabriel in the Louvre version of the Madonna of the Rocks (yes, that's the one Dan Brown thinks is spooky). This Gabriel is a trouble-maker. The lower lids of his eyes are clenched with fun, and his mouth is breaking into a smile. The eyes are looking at something specific that isn't in the painting. You, observing the painting, have caught part of an ongoing story, and the character of the participants is evident, but the story remains mysterious. There's something threatening about that smile, about the knowledge the angel has, which you do not have and cannot get. Again, we see a full, self-willed character, inviting us to sink into extended inquiry during our encounter with the painting.

What I learned from these studies is that for the pictures of people that I want to do, line, form, color, and light are not enough. They are the servants, not the master. They are what depicts, not what is depicted. What is depicted is the human presence. The success of the drawing or painting is to be measured in relation to the human presence, not the elements of visual design.

Young Mother by Daniel Maidman, 2011, oil on canvas, 30 x 24.

Young Mother by Daniel Maidman, 2011,
oil on canvas, 30 x 24.

I finished this painting just recently. The model's name is Piera. My paintings of Piera look a little Da Vinci-ish from the get-go because Piera herself looks a little Da Vinci-ish. In this painting, I wanted as much as possible to eliminate everything but Piera, the person. There are no clever ideas, no exciting bits of design. Just Piera.

I've been working with Piera for close to three years. If you're interested as I am in the humanity of your sitter, I believe it is important to work with models for a long time, to develop a textured sense of who they are. Piera had her first child a year ago, and she is very happy and very tired. All those things went into this painting, but they don't necessarily come back out of it. You might not know her story or anything about her. Would she still be interesting? Would you still stand a while with the painting because you want to get to know her better?

I don't know, but I'm trying.

--Daniel


Related Posts
+ Add a comment

Comments

CalicoYellow wrote
on 28 Jun 2011 5:12 PM

Yes, I would stand for a while, your painting does draw the viewer in and you can't help thinking about her as a person and wonder if...there are no distractions to take my mind of of her the person, the human presence is very evident.

on 29 Jun 2011 1:59 PM

Daniel, wonderful and thought provoking article.  Your latest painting speaks volumes about contentment of motherhood and the overwhelming responsibility.  Even if I did not know your history of drawing Piera through her pregancy, I would linger at the image you have so masterfully painted.

dmaidman wrote
on 29 Jun 2011 2:31 PM

Calico - Sharon - thank you both so much for your kind comments. I'm very glad that the painting has something to say to each of you, and I really appreciate your taking the time to let me know. Piera's off on summer vacation, but I can't wait to get back to work with her when she returns to New York. Happy art-making to both of you!