http://www.artistdaily.com/blogs/critique/archive/2009/07/22/charcoal-critique-quot-landscape-quot.aspxOur critic discuses the importance of texture when portraying the mass of the land against the sky.enCommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Debug Build: 40407.4157)http://www.artistdaily.com/blogs/critique/archive/2009/07/22/charcoal-critique-quot-landscape-quot.aspx#23499Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:27:16 GMT2bfc0e10-a4d2-4b68-ab7f-f11d606ed6fe:23499caroldnelson<p>I love the left side of this work. &nbsp;The whole composition is more interesting and has an improved sense of depth &nbsp;if the right third or so of the painting is removed.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://www.artistdaily.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=23499" width="1" height="1">http://www.artistdaily.com/blogs/critique/archive/2009/07/22/charcoal-critique-quot-landscape-quot.aspx#22443Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:21:45 GMT2bfc0e10-a4d2-4b68-ab7f-f11d606ed6fe:22443bsilverman<p>I also disagreed with an earlier critique and I also think Dawn is right on the money with this one. Giving a sense of depth by un-cluttering specific elements in the field of vision is the way to create interest or focus of specific areas of your composition. </p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://www.artistdaily.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=22443" width="1" height="1">http://www.artistdaily.com/blogs/critique/archive/2009/07/22/charcoal-critique-quot-landscape-quot.aspx#22187Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:02:43 GMT2bfc0e10-a4d2-4b68-ab7f-f11d606ed6fe:22187Judy P.<p>Since I took the time to disagree with the critique of the previous work &#39;Kevin&#39;, let me say here I think this critique of &#39;Landscape&#39; is spot-on. Currently I am slogging through problems with an oil landscape of mine, and find these observations clarifying. I will apply them to my own work- thank you for the insight!</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://www.artistdaily.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=22187" width="1" height="1">